Is My Money Safe? On The Soundness Of Our Banks

Banks are institutions wherein miracles happenmain activities: deposit taking and loan making.Most
regularly. We rarely entrust our money to anyone butbanks deposit some of their assets with other banks.
ourselves - and our banks. Despite a very chequeredThis is normally considered to be a way of spreading
history of mismanagement, corruption, false promisesthe risk. But in highly volatile economies with sickly,
and representations, delusions and behaviouralunderdeveloped financial sectors, all the institutions in
inconsistency - banks still succeed to motivate us tothe sector are likely to move in tandem (a highly
give them our money. Partly it is the feeling thatcorrelated market). Cross deposits among banks only
there is safety in numbers. The fashionable termserve to increase the risk of the depositing bank (as
today is "moral hazard". The implicit guarantees ofthe recent affair with Toko Bank in Russia and the
the state and of other financial institutions moves usbanking crisis in South Korea have
to take risks which we would, otherwise, havedemonstrated).Further closer to the bottom line are
avoided. Partly it is the sophistication of the banks inthe bank's operating expenses: salaries, depreciation,
marketing and promoting themselves and theirfixed or capital assets (real estate and equipment)
products. Glossy brochures, professional computerand administrative expenses. The rule of thumb is:
and video presentations and vast, shrine-like, realthe higher these expenses, the worse. The great
estate complexes all serve to enhance the image ofhistorian Toynbee once said that great civilizations
the banks as the temples of the new religion ofcollapse immediately after they bequeath to us the
money.But what is behind all this? How can we judgemost impressive buildings. This is doubly true with
the soundness of our banks? In other words, howbanks. If you see a bank fervently engaged in the
can we tell if our money is safely tucked away in aconstruction of palatial branches - stay away from
safe haven?The reflex is to go to the bank's balanceit.All considered, banks are risk traders. They live off
sheets. Banks and balance sheets have been boththe mismatch between assets and liabilities. To the
invented in their modern form in the 15th century. Abest of their ability, they try to second guess the
balance sheet, coupled with other financialmarkets and reduce such a mismatch by assuming
statements is supposed to provide us with a truepart of the risks and by engaging in proper portfolio
and full picture of the health of the bank, its past andmanagement. For this they charge fees and
its long-term prospects. The surprising thing is that -commissions, interest and profits - which constitute
despite common opinion - it does. The less surprisingtheir sources of income. If any expertise is attributed
element is that it is rather useless unless you knowto the banking system, it is risk management. Banks
how to read it.Financial Statements (Income - akaare supposed to adequately assess, control and
Profit and Loss - Statement, Cash Flow Statementminimize credit risks. They are required to implement
and Balance Sheet) come in many forms. Sometimescredit rating mechanisms (credit analysis), efficient
they conform to Western accounting standards (theand exclusive information-gathering systems, and to
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, GAAP, orput in place the right lending policies and procedures.
the less rigorous and more fuzzily wordedJust in case they misread the market risks and these
International Accounting Standards, IAS). Otherwise,turned into credit risks (which happens only too
they conform to local accounting standards, whichoften), banks are supposed to put aside amounts of
often leave a lot to be desired. Still, you should lookmoney which could realistically offset loans gone sour
for banks, which make their updated financial reportsor non-performing in the future. These are the loan
available to you. The best choice would be a bankloss reserves and provisions. Loans are supposed to
that is audited by one of the Big Six Westernbe constantly monitored, reclassified and charges
accounting firms and makes its audit reports publiclymust be made against them as applicable. If you see
available. Such audited financial statements shoulda bank with zero reclassifications, charge off and
consolidate the financial results of the bank with therecoveries - either the bank is lying through its teeth,
financial results of its subsidiaries or associatedor it is not taking the business of banking too
companies. A lot often hides in those corners ofseriously, or its management is no less than divine in
corporate ownership.Banks are rated by independentits prescience. What is important to look at is the
agencies. The most famous and most reliable of therate of provision for loan losses as a percentage of
lot is Fitch-IBCA. Another one is Thomsonthe loans outstanding. Then it should be compared to
BankWatch-BREE. These agencies assign letter andthe percentage of non-performing loans out of the
number combinations to the banks, that reflect theirloans outstanding. If the two figures are out of kilter,
stability. Most agencies differentiate the short termeither someone is pulling your leg - or the
from the long term prospects of the bankingmanagement is incompetent or lying to you. The first
institution rated. Some of them even study (andthing new owners of a bank do is, usually, improve
rate) issues, such as the legality of the operations ofthe placed asset quality (a polite way of saying that
the bank (legal rating). Ostensibly, all a concernedthey get rid of bad, non-performing loans, whether
person has to do, therefore, is to step up to thedeclared as such or not). They do this by classifying
bank manager, muster courage and ask for thethe loans. Most central banks in the world have in
bank's rating. Unfortunately, life is more complicatedplace regulations for loan classification and if acted
than rating agencies would like us to believe. Theyupon, these yield rather more reliable results than any
base themselves mostly on the financial results ofmanagement's "appraisal", no matter how well
the bank rated, as a reliable gauge of its financialintentioned. In some countries in the world, the
strength or financial profile. Nothing is further fromCentral Bank (or the Supervision of the Banks) forces
the truth.Admittedly, the financial results do contain abanks to set aside provisions against loans of the
few important facts. But one has to look beyond thehighest risk categories, even if they are performing.
naked figures to get the real - often much lessThis, by far, should be the preferable method.Of the
encouraging - picture.Consider the thorny issue oftwo sides of the balance sheet, the assets side
exchange rates. Financial statements are calculatedshould earn the most attention. Within it, the interest
(sometimes stated in USD in addition to the localearning assets deserve the greatest dedication of
currency) using the exchange rate prevailing on thetime. What percentage of the loans is commercial
31st of December of the fiscal year (to which theand what percentage given to individuals? How many
statements refer). In a country with a volatilelenders are there (risk diversification is inversely
domestic currency this would tend to completelyproportional to exposure to single borrowers)? How
distort the true picture. This is especially true if a bigmany of the transactions are with "related parties"?
chunk of the activity preceded this arbitrary date.How much is in local currency and how much in
The same applies to financial statements, which wereforeign currencies (and in which)? A large exposure
not inflation-adjusted in high inflation countries. Theto foreign currency lending is not necessarily healthy.
statements will look inflated and even reflect profitsA sharp, unexpected devaluation could move a lot of
where heavy losses were incurred. "Averagethe borrowers into non-performance and default and,
amounts" accounting (which makes use of averagethus, adversely affect the quality of the asset base.
exchange rates throughout the year) is even moreIn which financial vehicles and instruments is the bank
misleading. The only way to truly reflect reality is ifinvested? How risky are they? And so on.No less
the bank were to keep two sets of accounts: one inimportant is the maturity structure of the assets. It is
the local currency and one in USD (or in some otheran integral part of the liquidity (risk) management of
currency of reference). Otherwise, fictitious growth inthe bank. The crucial question is: what are the cash
the asset base (due to inflation or currencyflows projected from the maturity dates of the
fluctuations) could result.Another example: in manydifferent assets and liabilities - and how likely are they
countries, changes in regulations can greatly effectto materialize. A rough matching has to exist
the financial statements of a bank. In 1996, in Russia,between the various maturities of the assets and the
to take an example, the Bank of Russia changed theliabilities. The cash flows generated by the assets of
algorithm for calculating an important banking ratiothe bank must be used to finance the cash flows
(the capital to risk weighted assets ratio). Unless aresulting from the banks' liabilities. A distinction has to
Russian bank restated its previous financialbe made between stable and hot funds (the latter in
statements accordingly, a sharp change in profitabilityconstant pursuit of higher yields). Liquidity indicators
appeared from nowhere.The net assets themselvesand alerts have to be set in place and calculated a
are always misstated: the figure refers to thefew times daily. Gaps (especially in the short term
situation on 31/12. A 48-hour loan given to acategory) between the bank's assets and its liabilities
collaborating firm can inflate the asset base on theare a very worrisome sign.But the bank's
crucial date. This misrepresentation is only mildlymacroeconomic environment is as important to the
ameliorated by the introduction of an "averagedetermination of its financial health and of its
assets" calculus. Moreover, some of the assets cancreditworthiness as any ratio or micro-analysis. The
be interest earning and performing - others,state of the financial markets sometimes has a larger
non-performing. The maturity distribution of thebearing on the bank's soundness than other factors.
assets is also of prime importance. If most of theA fine example is the effect that interest rates or a
bank's assets can be withdrawn by its clients on adevaluation have on a bank's profitability and
very short notice (on demand) - it can swiftly findcapitalization. The implied (not to mention the explicit)
itself in trouble with a run on its assets leading tosupport of the authorities, of other banks and of
insolvency.Another oft-used figure is the net incomeinvestors (domestic as well as international) sets the
of the bank. It is important to distinguish interestpsychological background to any future
income from non-interest income. In an open,developments. This is only too logical. In an unstable
sophisticated credit market, the income from interestfinancial environment, knock-on effects are more
differentials should be minimal and reflect the risk pluslikely. Banks deposit money with other banks on a
a reasonable component of income to the bank. Butsecurity basis. Still, the value of securities and
in many countries (Japan, Russia) the governmentcollaterals is as good as their liquidity and as the
subsidizes banks by lending to them money cheaplymarket itself. The very ability to do business (for
(through the Central Bank or through bonds). Theinstance, in the syndicated loan market) is influenced
banks then proceed to lend the cheap funds atby the larger picture. Falling equity markets herald
exorbitant rates to their customers, thus reapingtrading losses and loss of income from trading
enormous interest income. In many countries theoperations and so on.Perhaps the single most
income from government securities is tax free, whichimportant factor is the general level of interest rates
represents another form of subsidy. A high incomein the economy. It determines the present value of
from interest is a sign of weakness, not of health,foreign exchange and local currency denominated
here today, there tomorrow. The preferred indicatorgovernment debt. It influences the balance between
should be income from operations (fees, commissionsrealized and unrealized losses on longer-term
and other charges).There are a few key ratios to(commercial or other) paper. One of the most
observe. A relevant question is whether the bank isimportant liquidity generation instruments is the
accredited with international banking agencies. Therepurchase agreement (repo). Banks sell their
latter issue regulatory capital requirements and otherportfolios of government debt with an obligation to
defined ratios. Compliance with these demands is abuy it back at a later date. If interest rates shoot up
minimum in the absence of which, the bank should be- the losses on these repos can trigger margin calls
regarded as positively dangerous.The return on the(demands to immediately pay the losses or else
bank's equity (ROE) is the net income divided by itsmaterialize them by buying the securities back).
average equity. The return on the bank's assetsMargin calls are a drain on liquidity. Thus, in an
(ROA) is its net income divided by its average assets.environment of rising interest rates, repos could
The (tier 1 or total) capital divided by the bank's riskabsorb liquidity from the banks, deflate rather than
weighted assets - a measure of the bank's capitalinflate. The same principle applies to leverage
adequacy. Most banks follow the provisions of theinvestment vehicles used by the bank to improve the
Basel Accord as set by the Basel Committee of Bankreturns of its securities trading operations. High
Supervision (also known as the G10). This could beinterest rates here can have an even more painful
misleading because the Accord is ill equipped to dealoutcome. As liquidity is crunched, the banks are
with risks associated with emerging markets, whereforced to materialize their trading losses. This is
default rates of 33% and more are the norm. Finally,bound to put added pressure on the prices of
there is the common stock to total assets ratio. Butfinancial assets, trigger more margin calls and squeeze
ratios are not cure-alls. Inasmuch as the quantitiesliquidity further. It is a vicious circle of a monstrous
that comprise them can be toyed with - they can bemomentum once commenced.But high interest rates,
subject to manipulation and distortion. It is true that itas we mentioned, also strain the asset side of the
is better to have high ratios than low ones. Highbalance sheet by applying pressure to borrowers.
ratios are indicative of a bank's underlying strength ofThe same goes for a devaluation. Liabilities connected
reserves and provisions and, thereby, of its ability toto foreign exchange grow with a devaluation with no
expand its business. A strong bank can also(immediate) corresponding increase in local prices to
participate in various programs, offerings and auctionscompensate the borrower. Market risk is thus rapidly
of the Central Bank or of the Ministry of Finance. Thetransformed to credit risk. Borrowers default on their
more of the bank's earnings are retained in the bankobligations. Loan loss provisions need to be increased,
and not distributed as profits to its shareholders - theeating into the bank's liquidity (and profitability) even
better these ratios and the bank's resilience to creditfurther. Banks are then tempted to play with their
risks. Still, these ratios should be taken with morereserve coverage levels in order to increase their
than a grain of salt. Not even the bank's profit marginreported profits and this, in turn, raises a real concern
(the ratio of net income to total income) or its assetregarding the adequacy of the levels of loan loss
utilization coefficient (the ratio of income to averagereserves. Only an increase in the equity base can
assets) should be relied upon. They could be thethen assuage the (justified) fears of the market but
result of hidden subsidies by the government andsuch an increase can come only through foreign
management misjudgement or understatement ofinvestment, in most cases. And foreign investment is
credit risks.To elaborate on the last two points: ausually a last resort, pariah, solution (see Southeast
bank can borrow cheap money from the CentralAsia and the Czech Republic for fresh examples in an
Bank (or pay low interest to its depositors andendless supply of them. Japan and China are,
savers) and invest it in secure government bonds,probably, next).In the past, the thinking was that
earning a much higher interest income from thesome of the risk could be ameliorated by hedging in
bonds' coupon payments. The end result: a rise in theforward markets (=by selling it to willing risk buyers).
bank's income and profitability due to aBut a hedge is only as good as the counterparty that
non-productive, non-lasting arbitrage operation.provides it and in a market besieged by knock-on
Otherwise, the bank's management can understateinsolvencies, the comfort is dubious. In most
the amounts of bad loans carried on the bank'semerging markets, for instance, there are no natural
books, thus decreasing the necessary set-asides andsellers of foreign exchange (companies prefer to
increasing profitability. The financial statements ofhoard the stuff). So forwards are considered to be a
banks largely reflect the management's appraisal ofvariety of gambling with a default in case of
the business. This is a poor guide to go by.In thesubstantial losses a very plausible way out.Banks
main financial results' page of a bank's books, specialdepend on lending for their survival. The lending base,
attention should be paid to provisions for thein turn, depends on the quality of lending
devaluation of securities and to the unrealizedopportunities. In high-risk markets, this depends on
difference in the currency position. This is especiallythe possibility of connected lending and on the quality
true if the bank is holding a major part of the assetsof the collaterals offered by the borrowers. Whether
(in the form of financial investments or of loans) andthe borrowers have qualitative collaterals to offer is a
the equity is invested in securities or in foreigndirect outcome of the liquidity of the market and on
exchange denominated instruments. Separately, ahow they use the proceeds of the lending. These
bank can be trading for its own position (the Nostro),two elements are intimately linked with the banking
either as a market maker or as a trader. The profitsystem. Hence the penultimate vicious circle: where
(or loss) on securities trading has to be discountedno functioning and professional banking system exists
because it is conjectural and incidental to the bank's- no good borrowers will emerge.